LARPCO is a closed-source autonomous agent-company framework currently in development and private testing. It spawns a full cast of named AI agents who plan work, debate approaches, and seek approvals before execution.
Structured autonomous workflows, currently in controlled testing.
LARPCO spawns a full cast of AI agents inside your GitHub repo. They have roles, titles, and a chain of command. Under the costume, the architecture is solid. The bit just makes it more fun to run.
Orchestrators, PMs, engineers, reviewers, scouts. They plan sprints, write PRDs, debate approaches, open PRs, and post standups to Slack. You're the CEO. That's your entire job.
Every engineer agent runs in a fresh context window with exactly one task. The agent that writes code never performs final review on the same change. Separation of concerns is enforced by design.
Every completed loop writes its learnings back to a shared ruleset. Bugs get documented so they can't recur. The system gets smarter through each internal testing cycle. Dot remembers everything.
Approval checkpoints via Slack. You approve scope, not implementation. A reaction emoji kicks off the pipeline. You get a ping when something needs a human. That's it.
Alma catches bad plans before any engineer spends tokens on them. A bad loop plan wastes every token downstream. Plans are checked before workers run. Always.
No proprietary platform. No vendor lock-in. The pipeline runs on standard CI infrastructure in a private testing setup. One script. Tight feedback loops. Still evolving.
A clear view of who we are, what stage we are in, and how teams can engage right now.
The current LARPCO build uses internal codenames for each role. Each agent has a clear scope, explicit handoffs, and a defined review boundary.
| Name | Role | Responsibility |
|---|---|---|
| Dottie | Orchestrator | Coordinates pipeline state, routes tasks, and enforces execution order. |
| Xanthe | PM Agent | Converts goals into scoped requirements and acceptance criteria. |
| Skye | Design Agent | Produces implementation-oriented design and interface guidance. |
| Blaze | Eng Lead | Breaks requirements into atomic implementation tasks. |
| Alma | Loop Reviewer | Validates plans before execution to reduce downstream rework. |
| Bindi | Engineer Worker | Implements scoped code changes in isolated task contexts. |
| Velma | QA Reviewer | Performs independent QA review and requests fixes when needed. |
| Pixie | Feature Scout | Proposes next-step opportunities based on recent outcomes. |
| Dot | Learning Agent | Captures learnings and updates persistent operating guidance. |
A task enters with human approval and progresses through planning, implementation, and independent review. You approve scope; the system executes the workflow.
GSD says "no enterprise theatre." LARPCO says "we exclusively do enterprise theatre." The PRs still merge.
| GSD | LARPCO | |
|---|---|---|
| Vibe | Minimalist, efficient | Role-based workflow with explicit handoffs |
| Structure | Commands you run | Company that runs itself |
| Human role | Developer | CEO |
| Agents | Subagents, anonymous | Named cast, roles, chain of command |
| State | .planning/ directory | ORCHESTRATOR_STATE.md + git |
| Approvals | Interactive prompts | Slack reactions |
| Tone | "No bs" | Process clarity with strong guardrails |
| Works? | Yes | Also yes |
Every decision in the system was made to prevent a specific failure mode. The comedy is in the framing, not the output.
Agents accumulate bias and drift when they carry context across unrelated tasks. Every worker spawns with a clean window and exactly the context it needs.
An agent cannot objectively review its own output. Velma and Alma are always separate instances from the engineer. Non-negotiable.
Xanthe writes better PRDs when she's never touched code. Blaze plans better when he doesn't also have to implement. Specialization compounds.
A bad loop plan wastes every token downstream. Alma exists to catch under-specified plans before any engineer spends tokens on them.
Dot updates the shared ruleset after every completed loop. Bugs discovered during testing get documented so they cannot recur. The system improves with every task.
You decide what to build and approve task scope. The agents decide how to build it. This keeps you strategic and the pipeline fast.
Built by a real company with a real founder, a clear model, and an early product currently in testing.
Punkyin is an AI-first product company founded in 2026 on the Gold Coast, Australia. It is bootstrapped, solo female-founded, and focused on building tools for developers.
Punkyin is not an agency or consultancy. The long-term model is a source-available core with a paid hosted offering for teams that want managed infrastructure.
The current system is being built and tested on Google Cloud, with plans to expand use of Google AI models.
Flagship product: LARPCO.
Brianna is a cybersecurity product leader who has worked across cloud security, incident response, red teaming, and product management. She founded Atlassian Beacon and is an inventor on U.S. Patent 11,895,130 for proactive suspicious activity monitoring. She was also a full-ride golf scholarship athlete at Penn State.
Short answers to the questions reviewers and early partners ask first.
Not yet. LARPCO is currently closed source while we harden architecture, safety checks, and operating workflows.
No. It is in active development and private testing. We are not presenting it as generally available production software today.
Punkyin, a bootstrapped solo female-founded company led by Brianna Malcolmson.
Join the early access list or email b@punkyin.com. Requests are reviewed weekly.